19 May 2012 | Sign In
|
Noel Hernandez Thursday 16 June 2011 |
A baby was born last week on an Iberia flight from Malabo in Equatorial Guinea to Madrid. This unlikely event raises some questions that make us wonder.
Should pregnant women be allowed to fly?
British Airways requests that passengers travelling beyond their seventh month of pregnancy bring along a letter from their medical professional stating that the pregnancy is free from complications, and the expected due date. It should also state that the pregnant passenger is fit to travel.
Ryanair warns that pregnant women within their last four weeks of pregnancy, or within their last eight weeks when carrying multiples, are not allowed to board flights under any circumstances.
What happens when a woman goes into labour mid flight?
Planes do not have the sophisticated medical equipment needed for labour emergencies and during international flights the nearest airport can be hours away. It is true that doctors, nurses and other health professionals are frequently aboard as passengers, but one cannot always rely on that possibility.
In the case of the Iberia flight, luckily there was a midwife onboard, a GP and a paediatrician, who assisted the woman, backed up by the cabin crew.
The physicians determined that there was no need to alter the route, and the flight landed in Madrid where an ambulance was waiting to take the mother and newborn to hospital.
What about the citizenship of the baby?
This a delicate question since different countries apply different criteria. Conflicts of laws still exist, in particular between North and South American states, which typically adhere to the jus soli (right of soil) principle, and the laws of European states, which usually apply the jus sanguinis (right of blood) norm.
A conflict then, between thinking where the baby is born (the plane is considered part of the country where it has been registered) and the the social policy by which citizenship is not determined by place of birth, but by the citizenship of the parents.
The baby was considered Spanish in the case of the Iberia flight, since the mother had that citizenship and the aircraft that nationality.
| Comments | Post a comment |
|
Christine Bond 6 July 2011, 09:53AM | |
As soon as I saw the words 'should pregnant women be allowed to fly' I felt my blood pressure start to rise. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Gavin Bradley 6 July 2011, 10:04AM | |
We do need some common sense here. Whilst we should not ban all pregnant women, we might just consider applying rules to reduce the chances of premature birth mid-flight. Or, maybe, we could ask the mothers-to-be to exercise some discretion? | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Karen Bourne 7 July 2011, 07:42AM | |
I feel very sorry for the mother. Many people have premature births and this can be brought on by lots of different factors. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Charlie, Tonbridge 27 July 2011, 05:29PM | |
I agree with Christine's comments. I think the whole world is going crazy, what on earth next. Surely common sense would tell you not to fly if you were 8 1/2 months pregnant, but obviously pregnancy does not always go to plan. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
ncube grace, South Africa 3 August 2011, 11:58AM | |
i'm not suprise woman are strong are the mother of the nation .you go girl do it again.that the spirit i a'm happy about that she is strong | |
| Rating (0) | |