07 February 2012 | Sign In
Delay and uncertainty serves no-one in the Heathrow debate.
|
Catriona Wells Tuesday 13 April 2010 |
The various interest groups are yet again getting ready to re-open and re-discuss the decision on the future of the third runway at Heathrow.
The coalition of groups opposed to expansion argue that government’s consultation process was fatally flawed. The government, presumably, regard their process and resulting decision as correct – but perhaps recognise that, post election, all bets may be off.
The main players include Greenpeace and the Campaign to Protect Rural England, plus a number of local authorities within the airport’s noise footprint. They are all set to challenge the decision made by Geoff Hoon in the High Court.
It is very clear that many people dispute the logic of the third runway; some on environmental grounds, some on the economics of air travel and a few who simply do not believe that a British government can be trusted to bring the project in on time or on budget.
Sadly, whichever side of the fence you sit, the greatest damage comes from the uncertainty and the inability to find a workable consensus.
| Comments | Post a comment |
|
Jane Card, St Albans, England 15 April 2010, 02:26AM | |
This really does piss me off. What is wrong with just making a decision and sticking with it. I would be happy with flying from Manchester if they put in a high speed rail link. That would kill two birds with one stone and be the end of the matter. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Bill Wade, Kent, UK 15 April 2010, 02:40AM | |
Please, please reconsider Manston. It was a great idea and is now bang in the latest economic development zone of the South East region. | |
| Rating (0) | |