07 February 2012 | Sign In
Tweeter convicted under the Terrorism Act
Any Tweeting airport users had better watch their step in future as a man was convicted after an offensive message posted on the social networking site.
It has been globally reported that Paul Chambers, appearing in Doncaster Magistrates Court, was fined £1,000 and has been banned from Robin Hood Airport for life because in a moment of frustration he threatened to blow the airport “sky high”.
Snowy weather in January had forced the airport to close and Mr Chambers anxious about missing his flight to Northern Ireland posted the message : “Robin Hood Airport is closed. You’ve got a week to get your shit together, otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high!!”
He was arrested under the Terrorism Act a week after posting the message and then questioned by police for seven hours despite airport security labelling the threat as “non-credible”.
Turning an online vent of spleen into a criminal conviction may have interesting implications for social networking sites. Mr Chambers is the first person in Britain to be convicted of offensive Tweeting, so should users of the sites think more carefully before posting in future?
Since the conviction Twitter has been awash with people repeating the threat to ‘blow up Robin Hood Airport’ because of the verdict. How should the police deal with these and the inevitable future empty threats?
It has long been the policy whereby any threat towards an airport however seemingly harmless should be fully investigated, and although the well-being of UK citizens is certainly something to take seriously; is Paul Chambers really a criminal?
| Comments | Post a comment |
|
Peter Bennett, Telford 12 May 2010, 11:36AM | |
How stupid can you be? Everyone knows the rules about claiming to have a bomb etc. and to do it on a flight to Northern Ireland !? Yes he should be locked up, whether he is a criminal or just criminally insane hardly matters to me. All joking apart, we do have to recognise that terrorists are a genuine threat and that a lot of effort goes into security and we all suffer delays as a result of it. We do have to show some sense and respect for the authorities and I think he deserves his punishment. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Angela Paine, Andover 12 May 2010, 12:33PM | |
He must be a really stupid idiot. He should be banned form all airports and all public places. He knew what he was doing and that it was wrong. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Stacey, Dunstable 12 May 2010, 02:55PM | |
Serves him right. Think about it, if the airport had not been closed they would have had to close and put all the people outside and suspend all the flights. Crazy - I would have been very miffed if I missed my flight because of an idiot like this. He should be in prison, | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Neil Bond, Brighton 12 May 2010, 09:52PM | |
What has happened to the world when people can't just get a bit frustrated without being arrested and questioned by the police. Yes this was bad judgement but nothing more! Common sense is a commodity in short supply. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Steve Harman, Nottingham 13 May 2010, 07:13AM | |
Our local paper quoted his statement to the judge. Apparently, he said: "I apologise for whatever consequences have happened, but at the time that was not my intention at all. It did not cross my mind that Robin Hood would ever look at Twitter or take it seriously, because it was innocuous hyperbole." What a Pratt ! | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Ben Salmon, Kingston 13 May 2010, 07:53AM | |
The poor guy lost his job after the police turned up at the office where he works (worked). The best bit was that they then impounded his iPhone like it was a weapon or something. | |
| Rating (0) | |
This man turns out to have been a serial pest. The court was told about previous rude and stupid messages that he had sent to other social websites. Part of the trouble is that he is made to sound like he is the victim and that the authorities are interfering with his so-called civil liberties. I think he is just an idiot and ought to grow up. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Judy Barlow 15 May 2010, 05:44AM | |
There will always be idiots that put their own frustration before consideration of others. Yes, it was just an act of stupidity but he knew it was stupid and he knew that it was one of those 'beyond the line' things that you just don't do. Sadly, banning him for life makes him into a bit of an anti-hero. He needs to be made to feel ashamed. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Mary Glenton, Stirling 20 May 2010, 03:05PM | |
I feel a bit sorry for the guy. He is obviously a pratt but people do do daft things. A fine was probably the right thing. Banning him for life is a bit OTT. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Jenny Lane, Warrington 21 May 2010, 06:18AM | |
I suppose one question has to be whether real terrorists would use Twitter to announce a bomb. If they would, then what he did is dangerous and he deserves to be punished - not least as a warning to other twits. | |
| Rating (0) | |
I only just read this and I had not seen or read anything about it in the papers. I am embarrassed that anyone could think doing something like this was acceptable. I am not saying that it was a terrorist offence but it was certainly something that was stupid and showed a complete disregard for his fellow citizens and the reality of the terrorist threat. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Mark B, Kent 26 May 2010, 11:17AM | |
Yes this is just idiotic; the £1000 fine was justified. The guy was asking for it, venting his frustration on one of world’s biggest social networking sites. I bet this is not first controversial comment that he has made. | |
| Rating (0) | |
We were all young once and all did silly things. I do have sympathy for people who fall foul of authority and jobs worths, but I have to accept that bombs and airports do not mix and this type of prank is over the limit. So, £1000 was about right. The 'hidden' punishment is that he is very unlikely to see America again. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Helen, West Wickham 1 June 2010, 12:29PM | |
Apparently TV star Stephen Fry offered to pay the fine for Chambers. He believed the comment was taken totally out of context and the treatment/fine was undeserved. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Andrew, Woking 3 June 2010, 04:17PM | |
This was certainly blown out of proportion (excuse the pun). Surely Paul Chambers is guilty of sending a menacing message if he was sending it to Robin Hood Airport. As it was, he sent it to his twitter followers. That being the case, while his tweet could be observed by airport employees it was clear that he wasn't intending for them to read it. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Jeremy d 4 June 2010, 01:50PM | |
I am surprised the twitter moderators didn't catch this one early, it would have saved a lot of grief. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Glenda Kenton, Derby 9 June 2010, 06:23AM | |
I always feel sorry for the officials that have to implement the security rules. Should they turn a blind eye to behaviour which they probably know is stupid rather than truly dangerous or do they have to impose the rules just in case? It must be a difficult call. Terrorists are not stupid and they must watch us go round and round in circles on this. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Ben, London 9 June 2010, 01:46PM | |
I sympathise with Paul Chambers, for one stupid joke on Twitter he has had his civil liberties trampled on and now has a criminal record. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Chris Stan, Luton 10 June 2010, 02:45PM | |
Presumably Mr Plod will be feverishly scanning these comments and those on Twitter in order to swoop on all those who have dared to support Mr Chambers. That would make as much sense as the thinking behind the original prosecutuion. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Frank James, Liverpool 16 June 2010, 04:12PM | |
I cannot believe this poor guy gets a £1000 fine and a criminal record despite an investigation that must have showed Paul Chambers having NO access to explosives or evidence of purchasing or intent to purchase explosives is beyond shocking to me. God help all of us in this country, freedom of speech is being eroded day-by-day. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Peter Lowe 4 October 2010, 10:04AM | |
I see that he is appealing against his conviction. That should be interesting? | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Ryan, Kent 27 November 2010, 08:52PM | |
I agree with Nial, what has the world become when a piece of innocent humor is turned into a peice of criminal writing?! What has happened to the freedom of speach?! | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Dean, Slade Green 5 December 2010, 06:38PM | |
I think that he did not mean any harm. He was frustrated and was showing his anger through social networking. What is wrong with that?! | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Boris The Spider, Nottingham 10 March 2011, 05:50PM | |
That this ever got to court in the first place is a total joke. It was a silly thing to say, but people say silly things all the time. It's just NOT criminal. There was clearly no credible threat. Everyone from the police, airport staff onward recognise this until you get to the CPS and judge. They blindly and misguidedly applied outdated law. (written long before the frivolous posting on twitter came along) The appeal judge thought(despite being told not, by so many mambers of staff) that "anyone reading his tweet would think it a real threat" That is totally moronic, but do you know who the a real moron is? It's Stacey from Dunstable, on this thread. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Oliver, Sturry 27 July 2011, 05:38PM | |
Obviously this Chamber's guy has not an ounce of common sense. Of course we all feel aggrieved at times but to do something like this, the man is insane. | |
| Rating (0) | |