Airline passenger news and views

A DMR Service

19 May 2012 |

News & Articles Comments  

Rolls-Royce Trent 900

In support of our world-class engineering company

Eugene Gold Eugene Gold
Friday 19 November 2010

I have kept a bit quiet about the problems faced by Rolls-Royce with their Trent 900 engine.  I have certainly not wanted to fan the flames nor could I offer any sensible comments. 

The company took the same line and, sadly, have been criticised for it. Perhaps we are so used to instant news and instant inane comment that we no longer regard it as necessary to discover the facts before responding.RB211.jpg

Rolls-Royce (or Royce’s as it should be known for its engineering founder) make a very complex product.

This is not some mass-produced car engine, a Trent 900 engine is the result of 40 years of development of the RB-211 family of engines and each component, screw and bolt is individually engineered.

Non-engineers would laugh at the idea of personality in inanimate objects but you can bet that every component of the fated engine ‘belonged’ to someone who had either designed it, made it or installed it. World Class engineering is like this and Royce’s epitomises the best of the best.

Clearly, the engine failed in such a dramatic way that turbine blades broke from the engine and failed to be contained by the engine casing.  This is the worst case scenario.

Single engine failure is acceptable in as much that multi-engine aircraft are designed to cope. Having engine debris cut through the wing, control surfaces and hydraulics is unacceptable and highlights the seriousness of the failure.

The Trent 900 is probably the most advanced aero engine in the world. The GE- Pratt and Whitney joint venture is up there in the battle of technology leap-frog but the Trent 900 is the engine of choice for the A380. The technology behind all of these engines is mind-blowing and the tolerances are microscopic.

So, what went wrong? Royce’s say that they have identified the event sequence and the component area in which the problem started. Thousands of hours of technical analysis will have gone into that one bland statement. Many more hours will go into defining and refining a solution and many hours after that will go into re-testing.

Do we continue to trust Rolls-Royce? Damn right we do. 

These are complicated and difficult problems. Politicians, press pundits and commentators cannot help us here. We need the experience of down-to-earth engineers who have the credentials and ambition to be the best in the world.

Elanor Keith
Elanor Keith
23 November 2010, 01:27PM

We should be proud of our engineering heritage and do everything possible to support this great British company

  Rating (0)
KimLester
KimLester, United Kingdom
24 November 2010, 09:44AM

I am glad to read that Quantas are flying their grounded A380s again. That should help boost confidence.

  Rating (0)
JackLong
JackLong, United Kingdom
24 November 2010, 10:06AM

When Toyota had their problems and fell from iconic status, the whole of Japan felt the embarrassment and rallied behind the company.
Most people here do not seem to care.
We have one of the greatest companies in the world - would it not be a good idea to support it?

  Rating (0)
Rahman
Rahman
24 November 2010, 03:52PM

It is all very good saying that Rolls Rocye are a great company but would you want to be flying with an engine that can fall apart and smash up the wing.

  Rating (0)
Petra Wicks
Petra Wicks
30 November 2010, 10:46AM

The Chinese have just voted with their new order and cheque books. They trust Rolls-Royce so we should get behind this National icon and support them too.

  Rating (0)
Harry Tubbs
Harry Tubbs, UK
1 January 2011, 04:05PM

What with the cricket and the floods, perhaps Quantas should ease up on criticising RR at the moment.

  Rating (0)
Lediard
Lediard, Munich, Germany
7 January 2011, 11:04AM

RR are the absolute masters at developing. They WILL get the 900,1000, and XWB right. Three shaft design is superb for big aircraft. No doubt RRs' lawyers have told them to say very little over the Qantas/900 affair as its very much on going - so RR are saying very little and better so.

  Rating (0)
Stuart
Stuart
12 January 2011, 04:26PM

I do wish that pundits would keep there big pudding muncher shut more often as incorrect, badly researched gossip costs jobs and ruins lives.
Thanks holding back.
I will recommend the first paragraph to many.

  Rating (0)
KaBoom
KaBoom
19 January 2012, 06:15PM

Stuart, hope you weren't travelling in that aircraft when it happened. Thanks to Airbus design a catastrophe was averted. How come GE have not had any engines that did not cause any problems? Sometimes cavalier attitudes, and to be the first does not mean that safety is compromised. RR - back to extensive Records and Research please, so that the product is faultless. Yes support RR, but we also hope that the older Trent 900's out there are checked out, so there are no more mid air dramas as such.

  Rating (0)
Name *
Location
E-mail
Comment *