19 May 2012 | Sign In
A new tactic to destroy an airline
|
Jasper Kelly Sunday 16 May 2010 |
The Unite union have clarified their plans for a campaign of phantom strikes in which they announce strikes that they have no intention of implementing. These phantom strike calls will cause significant damage BA and its passengers, with only minimal cost to the union and its members.
One cabin-crew member, an ardent supporter of the action, told flights.co.uk that this tactic would work because even the threat of a strike would make passengers think twice before booking with the British Airways. Better yet, the cost to BA of implementing their strike breaking plans and then re-organising schedules afterwards was massive and would bring the company to its knees more quickly than with the current strike program.
Obviously, not all cabin crew staff and probably not all strikers take such a hard line. But, what this conversation did illustrate was a willingness for some to destroy an airline, an employer and thousands of jobs in the name of collective action.
I do not profess to have any solution, or perhaps any understanding of the bitter enmity that drives this action, I just know that I am dreadfully sorry for the state of affairs that threaten to damage us all.
| Comments | Post a comment |
|
Harry L, Lincoln 21 May 2010, 12:27PM | |
Phantom strikes are definetly a less damaging tactic and will not effect any travellers who have booked well in advance. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
One of many strikers, Heathrow 22 May 2010, 12:39PM | |
This is the guerrilla tactic that we should have used from the very beginning. At the moment we are hurting on £45 per day strike money. By not actually striking we could kill off BA's bookings and get rid of Walsh within a few weeks. We need to get serious to bring this arrogant management to its senses. | |
| Rating (0) | |
|
Cain Graham, Aston 27 May 2010, 06:53PM | |
If the unions want to destroy BA and the jobs of its employees, then this is the tactic that will certainly work. If they want to save jobs then it is a pretty bad idea. | |
| Rating (0) | |